Skrentny, John; Stephanie Chan; Jon E. Fox; and Denis Kim. “Defining Nations in Asia and Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Ethnic Return Migration Policy”. International Migration Review 41, no.4 (2007): 44-72. Accessed April 26, 2012. skrentny，约翰；陈斯蒂芬妮；乔恩·福克斯；和丹尼斯基姆。“联合国定义在亚洲和欧洲：一个比较分析，少数民族返回移民政策”。
Both Asia and Europe have various policies for co-ethnic foreigners, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and China in Asia have been taken as examples, compared with Germany, Spain, Italy, and some countries in Eastern Europe, like Hungary, Slovakia, Romania and Poland, to illustrate the similarities and differences in ethnic preference policies. The biggest difference of ethnic return migration policies in Asia and Europe is that the ethnic preferences in Asia are more practical and focusing on economic development, so countries like Korea and China prefer co-ethnic foreigners who have skills or investment return to the nations. In contrast, Europe pays more attention to cultural authenticity and protection from persecution. Moreover, although both regions have concerned co-ethnicity, policymakers in Asia emphasize it because of social characters of homogeneity while the stress in Europe appears more romantic and does not has a clear purpose on economic benefits. In addition, there is no global standard for countries to reach their co-ethnic foreigners. The ways are maintained in nations and regions. Taking China for example, preference policies for co-ethnic foreign Chinese are different in provinces regarding different situations. Finally, territorial boundaries have been constantly challenged by the economic activities across borders.亚洲和欧洲都有不同的政策co-ethnic外国人，日本，韩国，台湾和中国在亚洲已被作为例子，与德国，西班牙，意大利，和一些东欧国家，如匈牙利，斯洛伐克，罗马尼亚和波兰，说明异同民族优惠政策。乌克兰assignment代写最大的不同民族的移民返回政策在亚洲和欧洲的种族偏好在亚洲更加实际和注重经济发展，所以国家如韩国和中国的外国人喜欢co-ethnic技能或投资回报的国家。相比之下，欧洲更注重文化真实性和保护免受迫害。此外，虽然这两个地区有关co-ethnicity，决策者在亚洲强调因为社会特征的均匀性而应力在欧洲出现更浪漫，没有一个明确的目的，经济效益。此外，没有任何的全球标准的国家达到其co-ethnic外国人。如何保持在国家和地区。以中国为例，优惠政策co-ethnic对外汉语不同省份的不同情况。最后，领土边界一直不断挑战的经济活动跨越国界。
Questions:
1. Chinese government does not recognize dual nationality which it had initially been designed for overseas Chinese in South East Asia. Before 1955, Chinese government had acquiesced in dual nationality, but it caused huge troubles and broken out a large scale of anti-Chinese wave in some South Eastern countries. For easing up relations with those countries, Chinese government published the law of single nationality. However, with the age of globalization is coming up, some people think that the government should officially recognize dual nationality, in order to better attract skilled and wealthy co-ethnic foreigners return to China and protect the rights and benefits of those who are already in the country, but others concern that there will be more problems accompany with it, like ordinary Chinese citizens may feel more uncomfortable and unequal when they see some elites with dual nationality and it may reduce national cohesion; the law of dual nationality may once again cause suspicions of countries in South East Asia; outlaws may also take advantage of this law to evade legal sanctions. My question is that how to adjust the nationality law to new situation without disturbing social order?
问题：
1中国政府不承认双重国籍，它最初被设计为东南亚华侨华人。1955岁之前，中国政府已经默许双重国籍，但所造成的巨大困难，打破了大量反华浪潮在一些东方国家。为缓解和那些国家的关系，中国政府颁布法律单一国籍。然而，随着全球化时代的到来，有人认为政府应该正式承认双重国籍，以便更好的吸引熟练和富有co-ethnic外国人返回中国，保护的权利和利益的那些谁已经在该国，但其他人担心，将有更多的问题，与之相伴，像普通的中国公民可以更不舒服的感觉，当他们看到一些精英与双重国籍，它可以减少民族凝聚力；法律
15012858052
153688106
